Iris Nebula and a hello

Astrophotography: share your photos & discuss techniques
User avatar
Stargrrl
Treasurer
Posts: 980
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 5:51 pm

Re: Iris Nebula and a hello

Unread post by Stargrrl »

Hey Sean - this is the perfect forum for that info 8) Rebekah
User avatar
AndyG
Network Admin
Posts: 1160
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Iris Nebula and a hello

Unread post by AndyG »

Sean, Thanks for the processing details! I'll try to take some notes when I'm processing my next image and include them when I post it.

Can you explain the benefit of the LinearFit L to Lum part? That will match the RGB luminance to Lum, right?
Andy
Chuck
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:14 pm

Re: Iris Nebula and a hello

Unread post by Chuck »

Hey Sean:

Thanks for the outline on the steps you used with Pixinsight. Though I'm only using Nebulosity at the moment, your outline will definitely come in handy if/when I move up to Pixinsight, especially if I also move up LRGB imaging with a CCD. I guess Pixinsight would also help with processing my DSLR images and I may move there anyway at some point. Either way, if I do try out Pixinsight, I may need to pick your brain if you don't mind.

---- Chuck
Chuck M.

Meade 8" LX200 Classic OTA
iOptron CEM40EC and MiniPier on Meade classic field tripod
Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II
Canon 7D Mark II
ZWO 60mm f/4.6 GS with ASI120MM-S camera
Starizona SCT Corrector II and Virtual View 2" Rotating Visual Back
Pegasus Astro Pocket Powerbox
User avatar
NGC7000
15+ Years Member
Posts: 2881
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: Iris Nebula and a hello

Unread post by NGC7000 »

Hi Sean,

Very nice image. As Andy stated , you nailed it with those dust clouds. Not an easy image by any means, especially with LP.

TomH
Tom H
"Science knows no country, because knowledge belongs to humanity, and is the torch which illuminates the world. Science is the highest personification of the nation because that nation will remain the first which carries the furthest the works of thought and intelligence." - Louis Pasteur
User avatar
rjbokleman
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 11:09 pm

Re: Iris Nebula and a hello

Unread post by rjbokleman »

Sean,

Welcome and very, very nicely done! 29.5 hours on a single target? That is dedication for sure! :P
Ron B.
T5i/700D, ASI1600MM-C, ASI120MM, ASI174MM, XAGYL 7x36mm FW
Astronomik Deep-Sky(RGB), CLS, Ha, OIII, SII
SV60EDS 60mm f/5.5 APO
AT65EDQ 65mm f/6.5 ED Quadruplet
SW ProED 100mm f/9.0 Doublet APO
C8 EdgeHD, AT130EDT
AVX, iEQ45 Pro

http://www.astrobin.com/users/rjbokleman/
User avatar
rjbokleman
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 11:09 pm

Re: Iris Nebula and a hello

Unread post by rjbokleman »

AndyG wrote:Sean, Thanks for the processing details! I'll try to take some notes when I'm processing my next image and include them when I post it.

Can you explain the benefit of the LinearFit L to Lum part? That will match the RGB luminance to Lum, right?
Andy,

Jon Rista has an interesting take on LinearFit here: https://jonrista.com/the-astrophotograp ... linearfit/

I use it earlier in my post processing than Sean did in this example, but Jon does make mention that LF can be beneficial later on as well.
Ron B.
T5i/700D, ASI1600MM-C, ASI120MM, ASI174MM, XAGYL 7x36mm FW
Astronomik Deep-Sky(RGB), CLS, Ha, OIII, SII
SV60EDS 60mm f/5.5 APO
AT65EDQ 65mm f/6.5 ED Quadruplet
SW ProED 100mm f/9.0 Doublet APO
C8 EdgeHD, AT130EDT
AVX, iEQ45 Pro

http://www.astrobin.com/users/rjbokleman/
User avatar
AndyG
Network Admin
Posts: 1160
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Iris Nebula and a hello

Unread post by AndyG »

Thanks Ron. What I was actually trying to ask about was Sean's thoughts on applying LF in the way he did at that point in his process.
Andy
dodgeandburn

Re: Iris Nebula and a hello

Unread post by dodgeandburn »

Andy,

The reason I do the LinearFit is due to finding this post that described the method. I liked it because it seemed to remove most of the guess work out of stretching the L and RGB "by eye" before combining, and makes it seem more repeatable (I like repeatable). This Iris Nebula image is actually my first LRGB image. Before this I've done only RGB because I couldn't get LRGB to work well enough. But this object seemed to really need L, so I dug in and tried to figure it out. It helped a lot.

Ron,

The Jon Rista page is interesting in terms of using LinearFit for a basic initial color calibration. Thanks for that link. I'm going to try that the next time as I do feel like my color is just slightly off sometimes and I struggle with it.


Chuck,

I think PixInsight could compliment Nebulosity because isn't Nebulosity just for acquiring frames? Pixinsight will work with DSLR, that's what I used to use, and it just means you have to take 1 or 2 extra initial steps to convert & de-bayer the images. In any case, I'd be happy to help were I can, but I'm still learning lots!


TomH,

Thanks! LP is a pain... would like to have a dedicated observatory in NM... or even on the Cape would be fine, too.
User avatar
AndyG
Network Admin
Posts: 1160
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Iris Nebula and a hello

Unread post by AndyG »

dodgeandburn wrote:Andy,
The reason I do the LinearFit is due to finding this post that described the method. I liked it because it seemed to remove most of the guess work out of stretching the L and RGB "by eye" before combining, and makes it seem more repeatable (I like repeatable).
Ah yes, I see now. I just applied the technique on an image I am working on and you're absolutely right, it removes the guess-work in matching the Lum and RGB stretches. Thanks for the tip!
Andy
Chuck
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:14 pm

Re: Iris Nebula and a hello

Unread post by Chuck »

dodgeandburn wrote:Chuck,

I think PixInsight could compliment Nebulosity because isn't Nebulosity just for acquiring frames? Pixinsight will work with DSLR, that's what I used to use, and it just means you have to take 1 or 2 extra initial steps to convert & de-bayer the images. In any case, I'd be happy to help were I can, but I'm still learning lots!
Sean,

Yeah, Nebulosity can be used for acquiring images but I use Backyard EOS, as that's what I started with. Nebulosity is also used for processing images but it's not as powerful as PixInsight. The draw of Nebulosity is its simplicity for those starting out like myself. If or when I decide to take the PixInsight plunge, I'd welcome your help, thanks.

---- Chuck
Chuck M.

Meade 8" LX200 Classic OTA
iOptron CEM40EC and MiniPier on Meade classic field tripod
Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II
Canon 7D Mark II
ZWO 60mm f/4.6 GS with ASI120MM-S camera
Starizona SCT Corrector II and Virtual View 2" Rotating Visual Back
Pegasus Astro Pocket Powerbox
Post Reply